They don`t want to use Video technology for football.
But they used video technology to suspend an Arsenal player that dived.
anyone that understands what am saying will know thjat uefa are bunch of classless people,
they have no right to support video technology but they used video tech to suspend a player.
I knew Eduardo dived, but i though the referees decision was final
I live in Paradise.
if u don`t like my question don`t answer.
and uefa are really gay, they don`t support video but the use videos to ban
They’re not only @ssholes but biased @ssholes who suck on Manchester United’s dick. I find it funny that United get away with everything during their games but it always seems the refs are harder on the opposing team.
Coincidence? I think not. And as for suspending Eduardo, well any chance to damage a team which is a threat to UEFA’s precious Man U.
same old thing
are you Wegners spokeswomen you never stop complaining and moaning, how long before you get sent off and made to watch up with the supporters
STOP MOANING
EDIT: dont like my answers that are the truth block me or stop moaning and being Wegners spokeswomen
References :
They’re not only @ssholes but biased @ssholes who suck on Manchester United’s dick. I find it funny that United get away with everything during their games but it always seems the refs are harder on the opposing team.
Coincidence? I think not. And as for suspending Eduardo, well any chance to damage a team which is a threat to UEFA’s precious Man U.
References :
They are biased to United because they know it happens to be a very popular tram around the world. The more popular a team, the more popular UEFA, and so the bastards pull a dumbass stunt like suspending Eduardo
I know, but UEFA has used post match video technology for years. The argument is for video technology to be used during the match. Which probably wont be employed into football for a while. Because football is still to poor in many places.
References :
I agree.UEFA are really sucking a** right now…Why didn’t they do this wit other matches.Uefa are being really f*g about this.
References :
what’s a Wegner? And I demand UEFA take action against other divers if you’re going to make an example of poor Eduardo! Drogba, Gerrard and Rooney you’re next! Feel free to add a few names in, possibly Eboue..
References :
Its been used for years eveen the FA use it. look at SWP in the match against Stoke City Delap fouled him with a two footed tackle. SWP reacted and kicked out. The ref didnt see it and only sent Delap off. but later when TV evidence was viewed. he was handed a 3 match ban. as the ref said if he had seen it he would have sent him off. Eduardo`ss problem was when he saw he had won the penalty he smiled. and it was broadcast all over the world so Uefa had no choice when the scottish fa complained. Deal with it you can guarantee it wont be the last.
References :
Video technology is used in many sports such as cricket – and you don’t get much more staid and traditional than cricket.
It is testimony to the small-mindedness of the games governing bodies that it hasn’t been introduced into football. It would give the 4th official a proper job to do rather than just standing on the touch line like a lemon being berated by the managers.
Surly we all want a minimum of bad calls and I don’t buy the argument that it would slow the game down, because it would take place during the time when the players are usually arguing the toss with a ref. I think the ref or linesman should be ale to call on it when needed and it’s use should be under their control.
References :
UEFA loves the english club Manure that is why they are messing with Chelsea and Arsenal. When their diving queen Cristiano Ronaldo dived like a professional diver they never banned him. In the last UEFA Champions League they screwed Inter Milan.
References :
Using video technology in hindsight is different to using video tech DURING a match don’t you think?
References :